BharatKosha
वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

Vedanta Parijata Saurabha of Nimbarkacharya with Commentary

by भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य (टीकाकार: श्रीश्रीनिवासचार्य - वेदान्तकौस्तुभ सहित)

DevanagariHindipublished906 pages

Page 270 of 906

Read in context
Page 270

[SŪ. 1. 4. 18. 250 VEDĀNTA-KAUSTUBHA ADH. 5.] held by Jaimini as well, with the words. “But Jaimini (thinks that the mention of the individual soul has a different purpose”. With a view to showing that it is confirmed all the more strongly as being based on the Veda, it is said “On account of question and explana- tion”, and for suggesting that it is celebrated in all the Upaniṣads, it is said “and thus some” The non-difference between the individual soul and Brahman, too, has been mentioned before,¹ and we shall speak of it carefully later on.² Hence, none but the Supreme Soul is taught as the object to be known. It is established that He alone is the cause of the origin and the rest of the universe, and not puruṣa, established in the Tantra, or pradhāna, superintended by it. Here ends the section entitled ‘Denoting the world’ (5). COMPARISON Śaṁkara and Bhāskara General import same, only while Nimbārka, as before, connects this adhikaraṇa more directly with the topic of the preceding part of the pāda, viz. refutation of the Sāṁkhya view, Śaṁkara and Bhāskara do not do so, but take it to be concerned with the general question of the concordance of all texts with regard to Brahman.³ Śrīkaṇṭha General import same, but he too does not take this adhikaraṇa as concerned with the refutation of the Sāṁkhya doctrine, but with the question of the difference between the individual soul and Brah- man.⁴ Hence according to him, the problem here is whether the ¹ Vide V.K. 1.1 1, p. 11, 1.1 7, p. 25, 1.2.6, p 52, etc. (Page references are to the K.S.S. ed.) ² Vide e.g. VK 1.4.20, p. 139, 1.4.21, p. 140, 2.1.16, p. 151, etc. (K.S.S. ed.) ³ This is evident from the fact that while according to Nimbārka the question is whether in Kauṣ. 4.19 the object to be known is the Sāṁkhya puruṣa or the Supreme Soul (vide V.P S. 1.3.16), according to Śaṁkara and Bhāskara, the question is whether in the same text the object to be known is the vital-breath or the Supreme Soul. Vide Ś.B. 1.4.16, p. 418; Bh. B. 1.4.16, p. 78. ⁴ Punar api jīvāt parameśvarasya anya-bhāvam upapādayati. ŚK. B. 1.4.16, Intro., p. 535, Part 6.