वैयाकरण सिद्धान्त कौमुदी (भट्टोजि दीक्षित - बालमनोरमा व तत्त्वबोधिनी टीका सम्पूर्ण पूर्वार्ध)

: "आत्ममाने किम्? दर्शनीयां स्त्रियं मन्यते दर्शनीयमानी चैत्रः। अत्र हि स्त्रिया दर्शनीयत्वं न तु चैत्रस्य।" Here the commentary might say: "अस्वार्थस्योदाहरणं निर्दिशति" or "अस्वात्मार्थस्य"? Wait, let's look at the letters in L13 very closely: Is it: अ - रु - ण ? No. अ - न्व - र्थ - स्य ? Wait! "अन्वर्थस्य"?! Let's look: अ + न्व + र्थ + स्य = अन्वर्थस्योदाहरणं ! Wait! Does "अन्वर्थस्य" fit the letters? Letter 1: 'अ' Letter 2: 'न्व'? In 'न्व', there is 'न' and 'व'. Wait, does it have an 'ा' stroke? Look: after the letter, there is a vertical line. But wait, in 'न्व', there is no vertical line unless it's 'न्वा'? No, 'न्व' itself has a vertical stem for 'व'! Wait, is there an aa-matra? No, the vertical line IS the stem of the consonant! Wait, but does "दर्शनीयमानी चैत्रः" exemplify an "अन्वर्थ"? No, it's a pratyudaharana! Wait, could it be "अयुक्तार्थस्य"? Wait, what about "अमुष्य