भारतकोश
हम्मीर महाकाव्यम् (रणथम्भौर चौहान वीरगाथा एवं इतिहास)

हम्मीर महाकाव्यम् (रणथम्भौर चौहान वीरगाथा एवं इतिहास)

Hammira Mahakavya with Hindi Commentary

नयचन्द्र सूरि / डॉ. दशरथ शर्मा द्वारा

DevanagariSanskritpublished185 पृष्ठ

पृष्ठ 11, कुल 185 में से

संदर्भ में पढ़ें
पृष्ठ 11

10 Hindu monarch, who nobly replied that the sun would sooner rise in the west, and Sumeru be levelled with the earth, than he would break his plighted faith to the unfortunate refugee. The siege of Raṇathambhôr was immediately commenced, and the fort was at length captured, but the heroic Hammîra fell in its defence; and the females of his family, determining not to survive him, perished on the funeral pile.” This history of Hammîra supplies some information which the sentimental and enthusiastic annalist of Râjasthân would have gladly interwoven into the pages of his work, and which sheds fresh light on the eventful period in which the hero lived. The Hammîra Mahâkâvya is divided into fourteen cantos, of which the first four are concerned with the hero’s ancestors,—the Chohâns, many of whom were paramount lords of India. ‘The empire belongs to the Chohân’ is an admitted Indian historical fiction, and the mere mention of the names of the old kings, many of whom were the lords paramount of India, accompanied as it is with much poetical nonsense, carries our knowledge of them a step further than the researches of Colonels Wilford and Tod. The narrative is, all through, very uneven. The genealogy of the Chohâns, as given in the first three chapters, though with some more names than are to be found in Tod’s list, cannot be regarded as satisfactory. The author really knew nothing about the more ancient kings of the race; the names are simply brought in to give him opportunities of displaying his power for poetical conceits, and thus the accounts of the princes about whom he had no historical information are filled with fanciful conceptions, in which some of the natural phenomena are explained with admir- able contempt of the teachings of the “proud philosophy” of Nature. From Pṛithvirâja Chohân to the death of Ham- mîra the narrative is fairly historic; but the author now and then, even here, relapses into rhapsody which amounts to a confession of his ignorance of the historical facts of the reign in hand.