अणुभाष्य (महाप्रभु वल्लभाचार्य - शुद्धाद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र महाभाष्य प्रकाश टीका सहित)

( 28 ) 8. He collected टीकाs of श्रीगुसांईजी on सिद्धान्तमुक्तावली and pointed out that श्रीगुसांईजी had revised the टीका at least four times. 9. It was he who first found out that श्रीव्रजराजजी of the 1st house wrote his टीकाs and sent them to his गुरु श्रीवल्लभजी of the 5th house who made many changes in them. The copies made from the original became known as श्रीव्रजराजजी's टीकाs and those that were altered became known as श्रीवल्लभजी's टीकाs. 10. He went to श्रीनाथद्वार, identified the fourth अध्याय of भाष्य as written out wholly by श्रीगुसांईजी, in which second interpretation of 1st two सूत्रs is subsequently added, thus conclusively showing that the whole was written by श्रीगुसांईजी. 11. He found out फलप्रकरणप्रकाश in the हस्ताक्षर of श्रीपुरुषोत्तमजी and published the same. 12. He collected two copies of भाष्यप्रकाश, first in श्रीपुरुषोत्तमजी's own hand and got and identified a subsequent copy of प्रकाश in which additions and alterations were made by श्रीपुरुषोत्तमजी. He adopted for publication the final copy of प्रकाश and hence we find differences in प्रकाश and रश्मि, as रश्मिकार श्रीगोपेश्वरजी had got only the first copy of प्रकाश with him. 13. He threw new light on श्रीगुसांईजी's life, which is published above with dates as traced by him. 14. He found out that the सुवर्णमेखला that श्रीवल्लभाचार्यजी presented was not to श्रीविठ्ठलनाथजी of पंढरपुर, but it was to श्रीविठ्ठलनाथजी of विजयनगर, where there was a temple of श्रीविठ्ठलनाथजी. 15. He obtained from श्रीब्रजरत्नलालजी of सुरत the will of श्रीपुरुषोत्तमजी and published the same. 16. He collected and published several खतपत्रेxs in पुष्टिभक्तिसुधा and वेणुनाद. 17. He laboured hard and succeeded in collecting रश्मि, the monumen- tal work of श्रीयोगिगोपेश्वरजी and with the help of श्रीगोकुलनाथजी of बडा मन्दिर, Bombay, he arranged for publication of the same. On account of his wide knowledge about the history of the सम्प्रदाय together with a clear preception of the facts of the case put before him he was consulted by गोस्वामिs in their cases, and his services were ulitised by S'ri Gokulnāthji of Bombay and his son S'rī Krishņajivanji in Madras and Dharangaon cases, in both of which they succeeded, and also by Shrī Gope- shwarji who also won his case at Madras. Again, if there was an attack against the पुष्टिसम्प्रदाय and his presence was required at any place he never refused, but started immediately. He had thus to go to सिहोर (near Indore) Mehemdabad, Patan, Savali and other places. 2028