ब्राह्मस्फुटसिद्धान्त (ब्रह्मगुप्त - शून्य, कुट्टक, बीजगणित एवं सम्पूर्ण २१ अध्याय सान्वय सटीक)

ोदयिकाः for (दलौदयिकाः)`

• Word: नाडिकानयुताः -> footnote 2: २. नाडिकोनयुताः for (नाडिकानयुताः)

Now, how are footnote callout numbers normally transcribed when transcribing line by line? Wait, in printed typesetting of that era, footnote callouts were often set in a separate superscript type or interlinear line directly above the word, or as superscripts. Wait! Are they separate lines of type? In metal movable type, superscript numbers could either be on the same body with high shoulder, or placed in an interlinear line if set with small type! Here, they clearly appear on their own vertical levels. However, if an OCR/transcription system transcribes them, does it treat them as: Option A: Separate lines , , , Option B: Superscripts attached to the words, e.g., भागो नन्दशशांकैः ११६८^५ शशिशून्य^७ ८७५२१ स्वरयामै^१ Wait! Let's think: what is safer and more accurate? Wait, look at २७।६४००४।०११. That is NOT a footnote callout number. It's an actual number printed in the text! If २७।६४००४।०११ is on its own line: Then the