प्राचीन भारत में शिक्षा (डॉ. ए.एस. अल्तेकर - गुरुकुल एवं बौद्ध विहार शिक्षण इतिहास)
Education in Ancient India by Dr. A.S. Altekar
डॉ. ए.एस. अल्तेकर द्वारा
पृष्ठ 277, कुल 335 में से
संदर्भ में पढ़ेंI, B] UPANAYANA RITUAL 269 married men, if they wanted to prosecute further studies under a new teacher.¹ It was thus essentially an educational ritual and bore some resemblance to the formality of the admission procedure in modern schools and colleges. In the course of time, however its signi- ficance changed. It was felt necessary that the services of the whole Aryan community should be conscripted for the preservation of the Vedic literature which had grown to considerable dimensions in the course of centuries; Upanayana and Vedic studies were therefore made obligatory for all. If it was not performed in time, it was declared that the person would lose his Aryan status and become unfit for marriage and social intercourse. This threat no doubt helped the spread of Vedic learning and gave an impetus to primary education, which was in later times presupposed by Vedic studies; but it also tended to transform this educational function into a bodily (śārīrika) ritual. It began to be argued that it should be performed even in the case of dumb and deaf persons in order to render them eligible for marriage.² Some late Smṛiti writers felt that the ritual was primarily for the purification of the body; they have therefore recommended that it should be repeated in case the body is defiled by the bite of a 1 Ch. Up. V. II. Here, as a special case, King Aśvapati excu the formality of Upanayana before beginning to teach his distin- guished Brāhmaṇa pupils. The latter, however, had come ready for the Upanayana. Cf. :— ते ह समित्पाणयः पूर्वाह्णे प्रतिचक्रमिरे । तान्हानुपनीयैव एतदुवाच । 2. See VMS, p. 361. The difficulty created by the impossibility of the recitation of Vedic hymns by a deaf and dumb person was got over by the theory that they may be recited by the teacher on behalf of the dumb student. बटुपठनीयानां मंत्राणामाचार्य प्रत्येकं पाठो विधीयते । Ibid. Some writers like Śaṅkha-Likhita however did not agree with this view ; cf. नोन्मत्तमूकान्संस्कुर्यात् । Quoted in VMS., p. 406