गोभिल गृह्यसूत्रम् (सामवेद कौथुम-राणायनीय शाखा - मुकुन्द शर्मा सटीक)

वक्ष्यते । स्त्रीणां". This clearly comments on "यथाकामी भवेद्वापि स्त्रीणां वरमनुस्मरन्"! So the printer forgot the marker (५) in the verse, or it's somewhere there. But footnote 5 is labeled ( ५ ).

Wait, let's re-read line 33 carefully: ( ५ ) अस्यायमारायः । vs अस्यायमाशयः । Look at the letters in line 33: अ स्या य म ा श य ः Wait! Is that a 'श' or an 'आ' or 'रा'? Let's compare with 'श' in line 34: 'वाशब्दो': 'श' has a loop on left, and a vertical bar on right with a crossbar connecting them. Now look at line 33: the letter has a loop on top-left, and a vertical bar on right... wait, it is identical to 'श'! Wait, why did I see 'रा' earlier? Because some OCR read it as 'रा'. But it is clearly 'श'! Wait, what about between 'म' and 'श'? Is there a 'ा'? Look at: 'अ स्या य म ा श य ः' Wait, between 'म' and 'श', there is a single vertical line ा. So 'मा'! Thus: अस्यायमाशयः ।

Let's check line 10