काव्यमीमांसा (महाकवि राजशेखर - कवि-रहस्य एवं देश-विभाग सटीक)

164 EXPLANATORY NOTES the power to express the meaning of the case-endings though they are absent in compound forms. ll. 17–24. मन्थगिराम्=the noise produced by the churning of the sea. This variety of अनेकाख्यात is called सान्तर because verbs are here interrupted by nouns. The other variety known as निरन्तर is so called because verbs are not so interrupted. The root of the verb सरस्यसि in line 23 is not found in the धातुपाठ of Pāṇini. It may be, therefore, read as समस्यसि. ll. 25–27. Bhojadeva in his S'r̥ṅgāraprakāśa ( 3rd prakāśa ) states the same ten-fold division of sentences as found here and illustrates the different varieties with the same verses as are quoted here. He also enters into a very lengthy discussion which is mainly based on the two views held by the Ācāryas and Yāyāvarīya as stated here. The Ācāryas maintain that अनेकाख्यातवाक्य cannot be considered as one sentence when it includes several verbs, because one verb connecting some nouns constitutes a complete sentence. After advancing this view of the Ācāryas along with several authorities from Vararuci's Vārttika, Bhoja, following in the foot- steps of Pāṇini and Patañjali, up-held the view of Yāyāvarīya as correct and denounced the view of the Ācāryas based on Vararuci's theory. Yāyāvarīya holds that there may be one sentence with many verbs provided that all of them are connected with nouns, and provided that the import of the sentence is one. Cf. S'r̥ṅgāraprakāśa :— ननु च निरन्तराख्यातं समुच्चिताख्यातमेकार्थाख्यातमावृत्ताख्यातमित्यादयो वाक्यविकल्पा नोपपद्यन्ते । वाक्यकारो हि मन्यते नास्त्येव तिङन्तयोः संबन्धः । तथा च तिङतिङः इत्यत्रातिङ्वचन- मनर्थकम् । समानवाक्याधिकारात् । इत्यतिङ्वचनं प्रत्याचष्टे । नह्येकत्र वाक्ये द्वे तिङन्ते स्त इति । एवं च वाक्यलक्षणं करोति—आख्यातं साव्ययकारकविशेषणम् । After advancing this theory with several authorities, Bhoja- deva concludes thus :— तदेषं सूत्रकारस्य भाष्यकारस्य च दर्शनेऽस्ति क्रियायाः क्रियान्तरेण संबन्धः । वार्त्तिककारस्तु युष्मदस्मदादेशनिघाताद्यर्थमाख्यातं साव्ययकारकविशेषणं वाक्यम् एकतिङ्ङवयवमित्यन्यदेव लौकिका- त्पारिभाषिकं वाक्यलक्षणमारभते । न च तेन लौकिको व्यवहारः सिद्धयतीत्युपेक्ष्यते । तदुक्तम्— निघातादिव्यवस्थार्थं शास्त्रे यत्पारिभाषिकम् । साकाङ्क्षावयवं तेन न सर्वं तुल्यलक्षणम् ॥ Page. 24. l. 2. Cf. Ibid—जयन्ति मृगलोचनाचलदपाहृतह्रिकमाः ।