काव्यमीमांसा (महाकवि राजशेखर - कवि-रहस्य एवं देश-विभाग सटीक)

ll. 12-14. सोऽयमनुग्राह्यो etc. Rājaśekhara approves of this kind of borrowing on the part of poets, while he denounces the other kind of plagiarism already described by the name of प्रतिबिंबकल्प. He quotes in support of his view, a verse सोयं etc. *[l. 14. अन्यथात्वमिवाच्छेति, आर्च्छति from आ ऋ. l. 17. ये सीमन्तित. (बालभारत. 1-2). Page. 72. *[l. 3. दिश्याद्धूर्जटिजूटकोटि. found in सरस्वतीकण्ठाभरण. l. 8. कपाले मार्जारः attributed to भास.] l. 17. नमन्नारायण etc. The purport of this verse seems to be that the ten nails of God Rudra's feet, by the reflection of black colour of Nārāyaṇa who bowed before Rudra, resembled the ten moons on the heads of the ten Rudras and they seemed to have come to worship the moon which is on the head of the eleventh Rudra. Construction in this case may be made thus:—नमन्नारायणच्छाया- च्छुरिताः पादयोः नखाः दश रुद्रेन्दवो (भूत्वा) रुद्र त्वच्चन्द्रं सेवन्त इव। The reading suggested as रुद्रेन्दवः in the text makes a slight change in the purport. In that case it may be construed thus:— नमन्नारायणच्छायाच्छुरिताः (अत एव) रुद्रेन्दवः पादयोः दश नखाः हे रुद्र त्वच्चन्द्रं सेवन्त इव. If the word Nārāyaṇa is changed to Nārāyaṇī, then this verse will give quite a different sense. The face or the moon on the head of नारायणी or पार्वती who bowed before Rudra, being reflected on the ten nails of his feet resembled the ten moons worshipping the moon on the head of Rudra. The purport of the next verse उमैक etc. is, however, quite clear, where it is said that the moon on the crown of Rudra seems to have taken six forms on being reflected on the five nails of उमा when he bowed before one of her feet. *[l. 25. अङ्गुणे, सैकते शशिमरीचिलेपने (जानकीहरण 8. 85). Page. 73. *[l. 10 कुरबक कुचाघातक्रीडारसेन attributed to रत्नाकर (सुभाषितावलि. No. 2564). l. 25. संविधातुमभिषेकमुदासे (किरात. IX. 32.)]