काव्यप्रकाश (आचार्य मम्मट - सम्पूर्ण १० उल्लास सटीक)

140 KĀVYAPRAKĀŚA यद्यपि वाक्यान्तरप्रयुज्यमानान्यपि प्रत्यभिज्ञाप्रत्ययेन तान्येवैतानि पदानि निश्चीयन्त इति पदार्थान्तरमात्रेणान्वितः पदार्थः संकेतगोचरः । तथापि सामान्यावच्छादितो विशेष- रूप एवासौ प्रतिपद्यते व्यतिषक्तानां पदार्थानां तथाभूतत्वादि- त्यन्विताभिधानवादिनः । तेषामपि मते सामान्यविशेषरूपः पदार्थः संकेतविषय इत्यतिविशेषभूतो वाक्यार्थान्तर्गतोऽसंकेतितत्वादवाच्य एव यत्र पदार्थः प्रतिपद्यते तत्र दूरे अर्थान्तरभूतस्य निःशेषच्युतेत्यादौ विध्यादेश्चर्चा । अन्वितोऽर्थोऽभिहितान्वये पदार्थान्तरमात्रेणान्वित- स्त्वन्विताभिधाने अन्वितविशेषस्त्ववाच्य एव इत्युभयन- येऽप्यपदार्थ एव वाक्यार्थः । यदप्युच्यते नैमित्तिकानुसारेण निमित्तानि कल्प्यन्ते इति । thing not correlated to anything else, and (b) according to the ‘Anvitābhidhānavāda’, what is ‘denoted’ is some- thing only correlated in a general way with what is ex- pressed by other words ; so that in either case the parti- cular object as related to another particular object is what is never ‘denoted’ ; and hence under both these theories the meaning of the sentence can never be the object of direct verbal ‘denotation’. Some people have urged the following arguments (against the ‘suggestion-theory’)—“In every case causes are inferred from their effects. So that when we find an expression producing a certain idea, we conclude that that expression is possessed of the potency necessary for ex- pressing that idea ; consequently, whether the idea be expressed directly or indirectly, the fact remains that it has been expressed by the word ; and hence every case can be