काव्यप्रकाश (आचार्य मम्मट - सम्पूर्ण १० उल्लास सटीक)

196 KĀVYAPRAKĀŚA अत्र य उत्पत्स्यते तं प्रतीति । एवं च तच्छब्दानुपादानेत्र साकाङ्क्षत्वम् । न चासाविति तच्छब्दार्थमाह । असौ मरुच्चुम्बितचारुकेसरः प्रसन्नताराधिपमण्डलाग्रणीः । वियुक्तरामातुरदृष्टिवीक्षितो वसन्तकालो हनुमानिवागतः॥१९०॥ अत्र हि न तच्छब्दार्थप्रतीतिः । [The first half of the verse is an example of this correct use of both ‘yat’ and ‘tat’ and the second half that of the correct suppression of both.] [Having thus discussed the correct use of the relative pronouns ‘yat’ and ‘tat’, the author takes up the thread of his remarks on the verse ‘apāṅgasaṁsargi’ &c.’, see above]. Thus in the above-mentioned verse, the ab- sence of the pronoun ‘tat’ causes a deficiency, and leaves something wanting to complete the sentence.—It cannot be said that the pronoun ‘asau’ has the same sense at ‘tat’; because in such sentences as the following we do not find the word ‘asau’ conveying the sense of ‘tat’— ‘Asau maruchchumbita ......āgataḥ’ ‘Like Hanumān, (a) having his beautiful locks kissed by the Wind-god (his father), (b) the leader of the army of the Lord of Tārā (Sugrīva), and (c) eagerly looked up to by Rāma, separated from his wife,—has this spring- time season arrived, (a) having its flower-pollen wafted by the breeze, (b) beautified by the bright moon, and (c) eagerly looked upon by women separated from their lovers.’ In fact if the pronoun ‘asau’ conveyed the same sense as ‘tat’, then the use of the pronoun ‘sa’ (the masculine