काव्यप्रकाश (आचार्य मम्मट - सम्पूर्ण १० उल्लास सटीक)

226 KĀVYAPRAKĀŚA एषोहमद्रितनयामुखपद्मजन्मा प्राप्तः सुरासुरमनोरथदूरवर्ती । स्वप्नेनिरुद्धघटनाधिगताभिरूप- लक्ष्मीफलामसुरराजसुतां विधाय ॥२३४॥ अत्र मनोरथानामपि दूरवर्तीत्यप्यर्थो वाच्यः । यथा वा त्वयि निबद्धरतेः प्रियवादिनः प्रणयभङ्गपराङ्मुखचेतसः । कमपराधलवं मम पश्यसि त्यजसि मानिनि दासजनं यतः ॥२३५॥ direct affirmation of his having ‘ become captivated ’,— the right reading being ‘ apahṛtosmi ’ (for ‘ apahṛtasya ’); specially as the use of the expression ‘ tathāpi ’ could be justified only as occurring in a totally different sentence [hence it is essential that there should be a finite verb in the preceding sentence, without which there would not be two distinct sentences.] Another example of the same :— ‘ Eṣohamadritanayāmukhapadmajanmā Prāptaḥ surāsuramanorathadūravartī Svapneniruddhaghaṭanādhigatābhirūpa- Lakṣmīphalāmasurarājasutāṁ vidhāya ’. ‘ I, born of the lotus-face of Pārvatī, who am beyond the reach of the longings of gods and demons, have come here, after having made the daughter of the demon-king such as has her exquisite beauty rendered fruitful through association, in a dream, with Aniruddha.’ [Here the sense intended to be conveyed is that ‘ I am beyond even the longings of the gods and demons ;’ [and this idea the words used fail to convey ]. Similarly in the following verse also— Tvayi nibaddharateḥ priyavādinaḥ Praṇayabhaṅgaparāṅmukhacetasaḥ Kamaparādhalavaṁ mama paśyasi Tyajasi mānini dāsajanaṁ yataḥ.