काव्यप्रकाश (आचार्य मम्मट - सम्पूर्ण १० उल्लास सटीक)

CHAPTER IX 335 अत्र प्रकरणादिनियमाभावात् द्वावप्यर्थौ वाच्यौ ॥ ननु स्वरितादिगुणभेदाद् भिन्नप्रयत्नोच्चार्याणां तदभा- वादभिन्नप्रयत्नोच्चार्याणां च शब्दानां बन्धेऽलंकारान्तरप्रति- भोत्पत्तिहेतुः शब्दश्लेषोऽर्थश्लेषश्चेति द्विविधोऽप्यर्थालंकारमध्ये परिगणितोऽन्यैरिति कथमयं शब्दालंकारः । Example— ‘ Yosakṛtparagotrāṇāṁ pakṣachchedakṣaṇakṣamaḥ Shatakoṭidatāṁ bibhrad vibhudhendraḥ sa rājate.’ There being no defining factor in the shape of con- text and the rest, this couplet is equally capable of affording . both. the meanings—(a) ‘ The king of the learned is resplendent, being capable of repeatedly destroying in a moment the prosperity of his enemy’s people, and bearing the mark of having given away hundreds of millions’;— (b) ‘ The king of the gods, Indra, is resplendent,—capable of cutting off in a moment, the wings of the great moun- tains, and bearing the character of striking with the thun- derbolt.’ [Here we have a coalescence, where there is no difference in the two cases, in any one of the eight factors mentioned above.—This kind has been called the ‘Abhaṅga-shleṣa’ ‘Unbroken Pun’, on the ground that it does not necessitate the breaking up of the words into its various factors;—the necessity of which breaking up leads to the above-mentioned eight kinds of Pun being called ‘Sabhaṅga-shleṣa’, ‘Broken Pun.’ ] . An objection is raised in this connection :—“‘A com- position consists (a) of words that are pronounceable by diverse ‘ efforts ’ on account of the divergence in their accents, ‘ samāhāra ’ and other qualifications,—and also (b) of words that are pronounceable by similar ‘ efforts ’, by reason of there being no difference in the said qualifi-