काव्यप्रकाश (आचार्य मम्मट - सम्पूर्ण १० उल्लास सटीक)

CHAPTER X 355 दिस्तु व्यङ्ग्योऽर्थोऽलंकारान्तरं च सर्वत्राव्यभिचारीत्यगणयित्वैव तदलंकारा उदाहृताः । तद्रहितत्वेन तु उदाह्रियमाणा विर- सतामावहन्तीति पूर्वापरविरुद्धाभिधानमिति न चोदनीयम् ॥८७॥ तद्वद् धर्मस्य लोपे स्यान्न श्रौती तद्धिते पुनः । धर्मः साधारणः । तद्धिते कल्पबादौ त्वार्थ्येव ॥ तेन पञ्च ॥ Then, as regards the presence of suggestion of Charm and other factors or of Figures of Speech other than the one, a particular verse is quoted to exemplify,—this will always be found in all cases. Hence when examples of particular Figures are cited, all these (concomitant issues) are entirely ignored. In fact, if we were to cite examples entirely devoid of any suggestion (of charm and other factors), they would be extremely distasteful. For these reasons, it would not be right to urge that in citing the above examples there is an inconsistency with what has been said before (regarding Figurative or Fanci- ful Poetry being devoid of suggestion). [The 19 kinds of the Elliptical Simile are next described.] 87. The property being omitted, this (form of Elliptical Simile) would be like the foregoing (Complete Simile) ; but in that case the Directly Expressed Simile would not occur in a word built with a nominal formative affix. ‘ Property ’—i. e., the common property. ‘ In a nominal formative affix ’,—i. e., in such affixes as ‘ kalpa ’, ‘ vā ’ and so forth ; in connection with which we could have the Implied Simile only. It is thus of five kinds. (1) Example [of the Elliptical Simile, omitting the common property, and directly expressed, in a sentence]