काव्यप्रकाश (आचार्य मम्मट - सम्पूर्ण १० उल्लास सटीक)

488 KĀVYAPRAKĀŚA स्पृशति तिग्मरुचौ ककुभः करैर्दयितयेव विजृम्भिततापया । अतनुमानपरिग्रहया स्थितं रुचिरया चिरयापि दिनश्रिया ॥६०१॥ अत्र तिग्मरुचेः ककुभां च यथा सदृशविशेषणवशेन व्यक्ति- विशेषपरिग्रहेण च नायकतया नायिकात्वेन च व्यक्तिः, तथा ग्रीष्मदिवसश्रियोऽपि प्रतिनायिकात्वेन भविष्यतीति किं दयित- येति स्वशब्दोपादानेन ॥ श्लेषोपमायास्तु स विषयः यत्रोपमानस्योपादानमन्तरेण साधारणेष्वपि विशेषणेषु न तथा प्रतीतिः । यथा is the same as the defect of either 'Irrelevancy' or 'Tauto- logy' (already described under chapter VII). For example, in the following verse,— 'Spṛshati tigmaruchau kakubhaḥ karair Dayitayeva vijṛmbhitatāpayā Atanumānaparigrahayā sthitaṁ Ruchirayā chirayāpi dinashriyā'. 'On the sun touching the quarters with his hands (rays), day-light oppressed with grief (heat), continued to be indignant for a long time (of long duration), just like a girl beloved of him'. Here, through the force of the common epithets, and through the choice of the genders of the nouns used, it is clearly indicated that the Sun is the lover and the quarters, the loved woman; equally clearly would it also be indicated that the Summer Day-light is the rival-beloved; so that where was the use of his being mentioned directly by the term 'dayitayā' 'girl beloved' ? [It would not be right to contend that the use of the addition of the word in question serves to make the figure the Punning Simile; because [as a matter of fact, it is a case of Punning Simile where, even on the mention of the