काव्यप्रकाश (आचार्य मम्मट - सम्पूर्ण १० उल्लास सटीक)
Kavyaprakasha of Mammata with Hindi Commentary
आचार्य मम्मट / पं. विश्वेश्वर सिद्धान्तशिरोमणि द्वारा
पृष्ठ 72, कुल 616 में से
संदर्भ में पढ़ेंCHAPTER II 19 स्वसिद्धये पराक्षेपः परार्थं स्वसमर्पणम् । उपादानं लक्षणं चेत्युक्ता शुद्धैव सा द्विधा ॥ १० ॥ ‘कुन्ताः प्रविशन्ति’ ‘यष्टयः प्रविशन्ति’ इत्यादौ कुन्तादि- भिरात्मनः प्रवेशसिद्धयर्थं स्वसंयोगिनः पुरुषा आक्षिप्यन्ते । तत उपादानेनेयं लक्षणा । “गौरनुबन्ध्यः” इत्यादौ श्रुतिचोदितमनुबन्धनं कथं मे स्यादिति जात्या व्यक्तिराक्षिप्यते न तु शब्देनोच्यते “विशेष्यं ‘Pure’ Indication is of two kinds—(a) the ‘Inclusive’, in which there is implication of the other (the secondary) meaning for the purpose of completing (the logical connection of) the primary meaning itself, and (b) the ‘Indicative’ in which the primary meaning surrenders itself for the sake of the other (the secondary meaning)—(10). (a) An example of the ‘Inclusive’ Indication we have in the expression ‘kuntāḥ praviśanti’ (‘the lances enter’), where the ‘primary meaning,’ the ‘lances,’ im- plies the men holding the lances, for the purpose of establishing the logical connection of the lances themselves with the act of ‘entering’ (which could not be done by the lances, except through the men holding them). Some people have cited as an example of ‘Inclusive’ Indication, the expression ‘gauranubandhyaḥ (‘the ox is to be sacrificed’), where, they explain, the primary meaning of the term ‘ox’—which is the ‘community’ ox—implies an individual ox, for the purpose of establishing its connec- tion with the act of ‘being sacrificed’ enjoined by the said Vedic expression; and they go on, this individual ox could not be regarded as directly denoted by the word itself, because of the principle ‘the denotation of a word, having its force spent up in the qualifying adjunct (which, in this