वेदों की प्राचीनता एवं काल-निर्णय / ओरायन (लोकमान्य बाल गंगाधर तिलक - खगोलीय वैदिक शोध)
The Orion and The Arctic Home in the Vedas by Lokmanya Tilak
लोकमान्य बाल गंगाधर तिलक द्वारा
पृष्ठ 371, कुल 548 में से
संदर्भ में पढ़ें330 THE ARCTIC HOME IN THE VEDAS. what was there to be blamed in thee when thou declaredest ' I am shipivishṭa ' ?" Yâska records (Nir. V, 7-9) an old tradi- tion that according to Âupamanyava, Vishṇu has two names Shipivishṭa and Vishṇu, of which the former has a bad sense (kutsitârthîyam); and then quotes the aforesaid verse which he explains in two ways. The first of these two interpreta- tions accords with that of Aupamanyava; and shipivishṭa is there explained by Yâska to mean shepaḥ iva nirveshṭitaḥ, or "enveloped like the private parts," or "with rays obscured " (apratipanna-rashmiḥ). Yâska, however, suggests an alter- native interpretation and observes that shipivishṭa may be taken as a laudatory appellation, meaning "one whose rays (shipayaḥ) are displayed (âvishṭâḥ)." It is inferred by some scholars from this passage that the meaning of the word shi- pivishṭa had already become uncertain in the days of Yâska; but I do not think it probable, for even in later literature shi- pivishṭa is an opprobrious appellation meaning either "one whose hair has fallen off," or "one who is afflicted with an incurable skin disease." The exact nature of the affliction may be uncertain; but there can be no doubt that shipivishta has a bad meaning even in later Sanskrit literature. But in days when the origin of this phrase, as applied to Vishṇu, was for- gotten, theologians and scholars naturally tried to divest the phrase of its opprobrious import by proposing alternative mean- ings; and Yâska was probably the first Nairukta to formulate a good meaning for shipivishta by suggesting that shipi may be taken to mean "rays." That is why the passage from the Mahâbhârata (Shânti-Parvan, Chap. 342, vv. 69-71), quoted by Muir, tells us that Yâska was the first to apply the epithet to Vishṇu; and it is unreasonable to infer from it, as Muir has done, that the writer of the Mahâbhârata "was not a par- ticularly good Vedic scholar." In the Taittirîya Saṁhitâ, we are told that Vishṇu was worshipped as Shipivishṭa (II, 2, 12, 4 and 5), and that shipi means cattle or pashavaḥ (II, 5, 5, 2;