पानीपत १७६१ (मराठा साम्राज्य एवं पानीपत महायुद्ध इतिहास)
Panipat 1761 with Historical Commentary
टी. एस. शेजवलकर / शास्त्रीय अनुवाद द्वारा
पृष्ठ 161, कुल 197 में से
संदर्भ में पढ़ेंTHE JUDGMENT 113 sheaf of papers connected with Govindpant. He thought that here was the key to the understanding of the whole Panipat disaster! He so far forgot himself as to change the dates of the original documents in his hand published in his first volume (Nos 175, 181, 183, 184) He even went to the length of en- tering into a discussion of a possibility of changed Eras¹¹ to suit his antedating of the said letters! Even Govindpant's caste came in for criticism and was tagged on to a letter of Naro Shankar, a Deshastha brahmin and not a Karhada! When a critic is obliged to fall back on the caste of a man for explaining an affair, he has fallen very low indeed! Govindpant as one of the most success- ful Karhada brahmins of his time was naturally taken as a leader of his com- munity In Benares, a large number of Karhada brahmins, well versed in brahmanical lore, were residing during these times They formed, it seems, more than half of the Deccani brahmins resident in that holy city During the Panipat campaign and even before, a rivalry existed between these Karhada brahmins and the Chitpavans headed by the Dikshit Patankar family, the mem- bers of which acted as bankers, diplomats as well as the spiritual gurus to the Peshwas! Sadashivrao wrote to Govindpant to settle the dispute as best he could ¹² The language used by these spiritual gurus against other castes was offensive and derogatory to their status Even the Peshwa is once found using a word¹³ for the Karhadas (Ambhasta) which makes them rank lower in the scale. As an individual, the Peshwa Balaji Bajirao, was a mild type of person, paying attention mainly to politics and ignoring other squabbles Sadashivrao Bhau, like his father Chimaji Apa,¹⁴ seems to be somewhat different, with caste consciousness at the back of his mind Even the Peshwa Nanasaheb was charged with being caste conscious by such an intimate family friend and serv- ant as Mahadoba Purandare,¹⁵ his Diwan during the first half of his rule Govindpant always tried to be on good terms with the Peshwa family from the very beginning as he was a personal servant under Bajirao He was prob- ably introduced into the Peshwa family by Radhabai, wife of Balaji Vishwa- nath, who came from the Barve family of Newre from which Govindpant also hailed Or it may be that he came to Bawdhan, near Wai, in the company of Ramajipant Kolhatkar who also hailed from Newre But his previous intimacy with the Peshwa family had by this time no value in the eyes of Sadashivrao who was a strict task master The Peshwa was so overpowered with the sense of indebtedness, that he had allowed a free hand to Sadashivrao in all state mat- ters, and Sadashivrao Bhau seems to have antagonised one and all by his line of conduct His opinion about Raghunathrao Dada and men of his persuasion seemed to have steadily deteriorated for at least three years before he under- took the Panipat campaign ¹⁶ Both military as well as civil sides in the state were disaffected towards him Govindpant's statement in his letter to Janardan Apaji that the Peshwa had then begun to search in small things, and that at 11 RAJWADE 1, note 265, RAJ 1, Introduction p 63, RAJ 1.282, note 325 12 Ibid 1 185 13 Ibid 3.501 14 Purandare 1 146 15 Ibid 1.275 16 Original letter in the Parasnis C. P F—8