भारतकोश
पानीपत १७६१ (मराठा साम्राज्य एवं पानीपत महायुद्ध इतिहास)

पानीपत १७६१ (मराठा साम्राज्य एवं पानीपत महायुद्ध इतिहास)

Panipat 1761 with Historical Commentary

टी. एस. शेजवलकर / शास्त्रीय अनुवाद द्वारा

DevanagariHindipublished197 पृष्ठ

पृष्ठ 77, कुल 197 में से

संदर्भ में पढ़ें
पृष्ठ 77

48 PANIPAT 1761 Bapu naturally must have come to loggerheads with Bhau when the final ac- counts of the campaigns came to be settled Peculation was quite rampant in those days in official circles and the Maratha state was no exception to the rule Profiteering at the cost of govern- ment was thought to be no sin and was a normal part of a wise man's living While some of the generals and diplomats and administrators waxed fat, the state languished for want of money The Peshwa's government perhaps suf- fered more than the other governments through this mischief, because the ruder Maratha generals were more grabbing and the selfish and brainy Brahmin ac- countants and collectors were clever at figures To spite Bhau now, Bapu must have taken full advantage of his difficulties in tutoring the Peshwa against him Bhau's advisers and assistants in this campaign were also rivals of Bapu at the Poona Court Trimbak Sadashiv alias Nana Purandare and Balvantrao Mehendale were not well disposed towards him, Nana Purandare was on al- most inimical terms with Bapu 74 In short Sakharam Bapu belonged to the party of critics of Sadashivrao's policy One is, therefore, led to believe in the truth of that one line commentary copied and reproduced in Khare I,75 which also explains to some extent the attitude of the Peshwa towards the Delhi campaign of Sadashivrao Bhau as reported by Naro Gangadhar from the Peshwa's camp in the Deccan 76 Sadashivrao Bhau, writing from Delhi in the middle of September 1760 to his intimate friend, Dhondo Malhar Purandare, states that there is no dif- ference of opinion between him and the two sardars Shinde and Holkar It means that the dramatic episode of Surajmal described in detail in the Bakhar is all imaginary and an after thought Honest difference of opinion about the policy to be followed against Abdali might be there, but the cause of his ab- ruptly leaving Delhi without taking leave of Bhau must be his disappointment Bhau would not place the city in the charge of the Jat, but appointed Naro Shankar as the guardian of the city and the palace, instead Surajmal was, no doubt, very shrewd and cautious His advice to keep the main camp with its heavy encumbrances back in the Gwalior region was sound But he was personally very selfish and always tried to secure his ends under the cloak of humbleness. This time he wished to follow the same path and set himself up as a regent in Delhi with the help of the Marathas His past behaviour towards the Marathas was neither very honest nor consistent After Raghu- nathrao's campaign against him in 1754, he occupied the lands in the Doab surrounding Kol Ramgad during their absence from the north in 1755 77 In 1756 he would not risk his troops against Abdali by joining Antaji Manakesh- war, though he took full advantage of Antaji's cover to guard his dominions and save his forts When Raghunathrao again returned to the north, he still kept himself studiously aloof and saved his skin Meanwhile he had reaped the harvest out of Maratha weakness due to Jayapa's assassination He sud- denly descended upon the strong imperial hill fort of Alwar which guarded 74 Purandare 3.82. 75 Khare, 1.25 6 SI D 2.133 77 Hingne 1.159.