रसार्णव (शैव रस-तन्त्र - प्राचीन भारतीय खनिज रसायन, धातुवाद एवं रस-चिकित्सा सटीक)

, which is incorrect. (13) K reads पलिने. M reads फलित. Both the readings seem to be incorrect. (14) K has रक्तादिसिगोमघाः, which is unintelligible. (15) K and M read भानु (without विसर्ग), which is grammatically incorrect. (16) सम- भाग निकारयेत्, an incorrect variant in M.

Wait, check : Is (3) लक्षवर्ष. or खक्षवर्ष.? Looking really closely at that word in (3): (3) K reads लक्षवर्ष. Wait, does it have 'ख'? Look at 'ल' in 'फलित' vs 'ख' in other texts. In this edition, 'ल' is often printed with that exact glyph. But whether it's 'लक्षवर्ष' or 'खक्षवर्ष', 'लक्षवर्ष' makes total sense with 'सहस्राणि'. Let's look at the letter again: it's 'ल'!

Wait, check : (4) K has निर्बली च वजीः. M has निर्बली फलित, wherein the last term Could it be निर्बली च बजीः.? In Devanagari, 'ब' without slash inside is identical to 'व'. So 'वजीः' or 'बजीः' is fine