भारतकोश
वासवदत्ता (महाकवि सुबन्धु - श्लेष-प्रधान शास्त्रीय गद्यकाव्य सान्वय सटीक)

वासवदत्ता (महाकवि सुबन्धु - श्लेष-प्रधान शास्त्रीय गद्यकाव्य सान्वय सटीक)

Vasavadatta of Mahakavi Subandhu with Commentary

महाकवि सुबन्धु द्वारा

DevanagariHindipublished244 पृष्ठ

पृष्ठ 68, कुल 244 में से

संदर्भ में पढ़ें
पृष्ठ 68

48 VĀSAVADATTĀ gave ‹unimpeded› prosperity and afforded delight in «intercourse» as the God of the Flowery Banner¹ gave prosperity to ‹Ani- ruddha› and afforded delight to «Rati». [15] Though a ‹demigod›, he was a «god», for he was a «benevolent» ‹receptacle of wisdom› ; though a ‹Dhṛtarāṣṭra›, he was a «friend of Bhīma», for he was a ‹ruler of a kingdom› «who loved virtue» ; though ‹come to earth›, he took refuge ² in the «courts of the gods», for he was ‹filled with patience› and took refuge ² in «good government» ; [16] though a ‹great reed› by nature, he was «smooth» within, for his was the nature of ‹Arjuna›, «upright» within ; [17] though born of a ‹buffalo›, he was «begotten by a bull», for he was born of a ‹queen› and was a «producer of government» ; though no ‹central gem of a neck- lace›, he was the «midmost jewel of a throat-band», for he was a ‹fearless›, «mighty leader». While he ruled the earth, ‹quibblings ³ and fallacies› were practised only in arguments ⁴ (for there was no need of ‹habitually checking deceit› ⁵) ; [18] there was ‹infidelity› only among materialists (for there was no ‹poverty›) ; there was employment of a ‹spur› only in executing commands ⁶ (for there was no employment of ‹petty enemies›) ; there was ‹picking› [19] only on lutes (for there was no ‹back-biting›) ; there was association with ‹threshing-floors› only in the case of rice (for there was no association with ‹evil men›) ; there was capture of ‹snakes› only among serpent-charmers (for there was no need to capture ‹liars›) ; ‹imposts› were cut only in the receipt of taxes (for there was no amputation of ‹hands› ⁷) ; ‹roots› were plucked out only in the case of «wormwood-trees» (for «ascetics» did not pluck out their ‹eyes›) ; [20] only lotuses opposed the ‹moon› (for there was no opposition to ‹Brāhmans› ⁸) ; ‹‘ ruler of the world ’› was applied only to the elephant of the north ⁹ (but not to any man ¹ Kāma. ² Srirangam text, ‘ he was the refuge of.’ ³ Srirangam text adds ‘ futile answers.’ ⁴ Tel. ed., ‘ only in Nyāya textbooks.’ ⁵ Srirangam text adds ‘ and castes.’ ⁶ Tel. ed. and Srirangam text, ‘ only in yōga-exercises.’ ⁷ Tel. ed. and Srirangam text, ‘ there was hand-cutting only in blossoms.’ ⁸ Tel. ed. and Srirangam text, ‘ the king.’ ⁹ Tel. ed. and Srirangam text, ‘ only to the world-elephants.’