भारतकोश
वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

Vedanta Parijata Saurabha of Nimbarkacharya with Commentary

भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य (टीकाकार: श्रीश्रीनिवासचार्य - वेदान्तकौस्तुभ सहित) द्वारा

DevanagariHindipublished906 पृष्ठ

पृष्ठ 363, कुल 906 में से

संदर्भ में पढ़ें
पृष्ठ 363

[SŪ 2. 2. 13 ADH 2.] VEDĀNTA-PĀRIJĀTA-SAURABHA 343 deeds being impossible on the part of atoms, the unseen principle must be necessarily admitted to be natural (to them), and in that case there will result the origin of motion at all times The second alter- native, too, is not tenable, because it is all the more impossible for the unseen principle, inhering in the individual soul, to urge the motion of the non-sentient (atoms) Thus, there is no motion "even in both ways". "Or ¹ else no motion is possible, whether it be due to the individual soul, or due to the Lord. Thus, does the individual soul give rise to the first motion through its own destiny (adṛṣṭa), or through its proxi- mity, or through its attribute of consciousness ? Not the first, because of the above-mentioned fault Not through its proximity also, because the proximity of the individual soul to the atoms being eternal, the consequence will be that it will ever give rise to the world. Nor even through consciousness, because of the absence of consciousness then And motion does not proceed from the Lord as well Is the Lord, according to your view, designated in the Veda or established by inference and the rest? If it be said: Designated in the Veda, then have faith in the procedure mentioned by Scripture thus. 'Every- thing has that for its soul' (Chānd 6.8 7, etc.), 'He became existence and that' (Tait. 2 6), and being overwhelmed with the sentiment of love for Him, be free from affliction,—what is the use of your doctrine of atoms ? If it be said: Established through inference and the rest,—(we reply :) that it (viz inference) is not even established has been proved above.² SŪTRA 13 "(THE VAIŚEṢIKA DOCTRINE IS UNTENABLE) ALSO ON ACCOUNT OF THE ADMISSION OF THE RELATION OF INHERENCE, ON ACCOUNT OF AN INFINITE REGRESS (ARISING THEREFROM) BECAUSE OF SAMENESS." Vedānta-pārijāta-saurabha "On account also of the admission of the relation of inherence," the doctrine of atoms is not possible, since just as a binary compound is connected with its own cause by the relation of inherence, being ¹ A third alternative explanation of the word "Ubhayathā". ² Vide V.K 1.1.3.