भारतकोश
वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

वेदान्त पारिजात सौरभ (भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य - द्वैताद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

Vedanta Parijata Saurabha of Nimbarkacharya with Commentary

भगवद् निम्बार्काचार्य (टीकाकार: श्रीश्रीनिवासचार्य - वेदान्तकौस्तुभ सहित) द्वारा

DevanagariHindipublished906 पृष्ठ

पृष्ठ 715, कुल 906 में से

संदर्भ में पढ़ें
पृष्ठ 715

694 VEDĀNTA-KAUSTUBHA [sū. 3. 3. 52. ADH. 21.] the state of realization, the individual soul is to be conceived of in its state of release. Here ends the section entitled “Existence in the body” (21). COMPARISON Śaṃkara and Bhāskara This is sūtra 54 in the commentary of Śaṃkara, sūtra 53 in that of Bhāskara. Here they answer the Cārvāka view that the soul is identical with the body. They interpret the sūtra in the same way, only Śaṃkara reads: “tad-bhāvābhāvitvāt”, instead of “tad-bhāva- bhāvitvāt”. Thus, according to him, the sūtra means: “(The soul is) different (from the body), not (identical) because the existence (of consciousness) does not depend on the existence of that (viz. the body), as in the case of perception”. That is, consciousness is not a quality of the body, since even where the body is present, there may be no consciousness, e.g. in the case of a dead body. Hence just as perception is other than the object perceived, so consciousness is other than the conscious body.¹ According to Bhāskara, the sūtra means : “(The soul is) different (from the body) not (identical) because the existence of (the qualities of the body) depend on the existence of that (viz. the body), as in the case of perception”. That is, consciousness cannot be an attribute of the body, since an attribute of the body exists when the body exists. But consciousness does not exist always when the body does, e.g. in a dead body.² Hence the two explanations are identical in spite of the difference of reading. Bhāskara's reading is prefer- able. Rāmānuja Interpretation same, only the phrase “upalabdhivat” interpreted differently, viz. just as the realization of Brahman, enjoined in Scrip- ture, means the realization of His real form, so exactly, self-realization too means the realization of the real form of the self.³ ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ¹ Ś.B. 3.3.54, p. 840. ² Bh. B. 3.3.53 (written as 3 3.54), p. 196. ³ Śrī. B. 3.3.52, p. 337, vol. 2.