अणुभाष्य (महाप्रभु वल्लभाचार्य - शुद्धाद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र महाभाष्य प्रकाश टीका सहित)

'ध'! Wait, what is after 'र्या'? Is there a 'त्'? Ah, look at the gap between that word and 'कार्यानुत्पादापत्तिः'. Wait, there is NO 'त्'! It is "वैधर्म्यात्"? But wait, in Sanskrit, ablative can be "वैधर्म्यात्", why would it be "वैधर्म्या"? Could it be "वैधर्म्येण"? No, it has an 'ा' matra. Wait, could it be "वैधर्म्यात्कार्यानुत्पादापत्तिः" where 'त्' is just before 'का'? Look at the space: there is a letter there! Wait, is it a letter or space? Let's zoom in a lot on line 20: "तेषां वै... " Let's read the whole sentence: "अत आत्मनामनेकत्वापत्त्या तेषां वैधर्म्यात् कार्यानुत्पादापत्तिः । अत्र नव्यैः प्रागभावः खण्डितः" Yes, philosophically: if atman-s are many, and due to their vaidharmya (difference in adrishta/attributes), there would be non-production of effects. Wait, look at the letters: ते - ष - ा - ं [space] व - ै - ध - र् - म् - य - ा - त् [space] क - ा - र् - य - ा - न - ु - त् - प - ा