गोविन्द भाष्य (श्रील बलदेव विद्याभूषण - अचिन्त्यभेदाभेद वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र भाष्य सटीक)

In the Rāma-tāpanī Upaniṣad it is said: oṁ cin-maye 'smin mahā-viṣṇau jāte dāśarathe harau raghoḥ kule 'khilaṁ rāti rājate yo mahī-sthitaḥ "Oṁ. Born as Daśaratha's son in King Raghu's dynasty, the spiritual Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is known as Mahā-Viṣṇu and Hari, was splendidly manifested on the earth. He delighted everyone." In this way the Śruti-śāstra describes the qualities of the Supreme Lord in His childhood and other ages. Many similar descriptions are also found in the Smṛti- śāstra. Saṁśaya (Doubt): Should one meditate on these descriptions of the Lord in His childhood and other ages, or should one not meditate on them? Pūrvapakṣa (the opponent speaks): One should not meditate on the form of the Lord in His different ages, for then the Lord's form would be sometimes large and sometimes small. This would contradict the Śruti-śāstra's advice that in one's meditation the features of the Lord should be harmonious. Siddhānta (conclusion): In the following words the author of the sūtras gives His conclusion. Sūtra 10 vyāpteś ca samañjasam vyāpteḥ—becasue of being all-pervading; ca—also; samañjasam—proper. It is proper because He is all-pervading and for other reasons also. Purport by Śrīla Baladeva Vidyābhūṣaṇa It is proper to meditate on the Lord in His childhood and other ages because the Lord is all-pervading and because the Lord is not limited to His features in His different ages. In sūtra 3.2.38 the Lord's all-pervasiveness was confirmed. The