काव्यमीमांसा (महाकवि राजशेखर - कवि-रहस्य एवं देश-विभाग सटीक)

TWELFTH ADHYĀYA 223 l. 25. नटनेपथ्यम्। When a later poet borrows an idea from earlier writing, but deviates totally from the original language, he is compared here to an actor who appears in a different dress from his original one. l. 26. नेच्छइ पासासंकी is read as पाशाशंकी काओ णेच्छइ in the Gāthā- saptatātī. (3-5.) Page. 67. ll. 2-5. The same idea, embodied originally in the Prākṛta language in the first verse, is expressed in Sanskrit in the subse- quent verse. *[ l. 7. कान्ते (अमरु 101;) l. 11. धन्यास्तु attributed to Vijjākā ; l. 16. ततोऽरुण० attributed to Vālmīki; l. 18. समं कुसुम० cf. ततः कुमुदनाथेन गर्भणीगण्डपाण्डुना । उदयाद्रिशिरःसीम्नि निहितं पदमिन्दुना ॥ द्रोणपर्व. ] ll. 15-19. In these two verses, the brightness of the moon is described as similar to the paleness of a lady's cheek. But the cause for the paleness of a lady's cheek, is mentioned in the first verse as emaciation due to the influence of passion, and, in the next, due to her being in a delicate condition. This is what is called हेतुव्यत्यय. ll. 20-26. The behaviour of the swans described in the first verse, is transferred in the second verse to the deer. Page. 68. ll. 3-15. Combining in a concise manner, the imports of two different sentences belonging to early writers, is called सम्पुट. The river Narmadā is called here a नदी, but, in fact, it should be called a नद as it flows towards the west. शकुल=a kind of fish. सरिताम् may be construed with अम्भः.