काव्यप्रकाश (आचार्य मम्मट - सम्पूर्ण १० उल्लास सटीक)

142 KĀVYAPRAKĀŚA ये त्वभिदधति सोयमिषोरिव दीर्घदीर्घतरो व्यापारः इति यत्परः शब्दः स शब्दार्थः इति विधिरेवात्र वाच्य इति । तेप्यतात्पर्यज्ञास्तात्पर्यवाचोयुक्तेर्देवानांप्रियाः । तथाहि ‘भूतभव्यसमुच्चारणे भूतं भव्यायोपदिश्यते’ इति कारक- पदार्थाः क्रियापदार्थेनान्वीयमानाः प्रधानक्रियानिर्वर्तकस्व- क्रियाभिसंबन्धात् साध्यायमानतां प्राप्नुवन्ति । ततश्चा- दग्धदहनन्यायेन यावदप्राप्तं तावद्विधीयते । यथा ऋत्विक्प्रचरणे sandal-paint has been entirely ...... thou hast not gone to that wretched man ’), the affirmation (‘thou hast gone’,— which has been held to be the suggested meaning) is what is really only expressed or denoted by it.” These ignorant people also do not understand what is meant by a word being ‘used in a certain sense’. It is a well-established principle that ‘when an accomplished entity (i. e., substance) is spoken of along with what is to be accomplished (i. e. an action), the former is mentioned as subserving the purposes of the latter ; and according to this principle, when substantives become correlated to verbs (e. g. in the expression ‘bring the cow ’), they them- selves acquire the character of ‘what is to be accompli- shed,’ inasmuch as they have to be the substratum of their own action of walking which helps in the accomplishment of the principal action (of bringing) [as the bringing of the cow can be accomplished only when she herself does the walking] ; and in this case (where the accomplished entity, cow, is tainted with the character of what is to be accom- plished, i. e. its walking), the direction in question (‘bring the cow ’) involves the injunction or predication of that factor alone which is not already accomplished. For example in the case of the sentence—‘The red-turbaned