काव्यप्रकाश (आचार्य मम्मट - सम्पूर्ण १० उल्लास सटीक)

CHAPTER VII 211 यथा वा तत उदित उदारहारहारिद्युतिरुच्चैरुदयाचलादिवेन्दुः ।। निजवंश उदात्तकान्तकान्तिर्बत मुक्तामणिवच्चकास्त्यनर्घः ।।२१२।। ‘ O King ! thy deeds shine resplendent even in the nethermost regions, resembling the sheen of the moon ; and the power of thy intellect and arms, functioning in the right manner, brings about thy victory and glory and shines in the world ’. [Here the disjunction between ‘tāni’ and ‘indoḥ’, between ‘bale’ and ‘atitate’ and ‘uchitānuvṛtti’ and ‘ātanvati’ even though gramma- tically correct, is highly discordant’.] Or in the following— ‘ Tata udita udārahāra......nijavaṁsha- .........udātta...........narghaḥ’. ‘ That great man of the exquisitely fascinating splen- dour rises resplendent in his family, resembling the pearl (appearing from the bamboo) ; and having his resplendence enhanced by the beautiful pearl-necklace, he resembles the moon (whose sheen is like that of the flawless pearl) ’. [Here the visarga is deleted twice after ‘tataḥ’ and ‘uditaḥ.] In this connection it has to be borne in mind that there are two conditions under which the disjunction in euphony is grammatically permissible,—in the first place, there is the very wide rule which makes all euphonious combination purely optional, and secondly in the case of the preceding word being a noun with a dual termination ending in the vowel ‘ī’ or ‘ū’, where according to ‘Pāṇini (1.1.11 and 6.1.125), no conjunction takes place. Now if the disjunc- tion in euphony is of the former kind, then even a single instance makes the sentence defective ; while if it belongs