काव्यप्रकाश (आचार्य मम्मट - सम्पूर्ण १० उल्लास सटीक)

CHAPTER VII 221 यथा वा त्वमेवंसौन्दर्या स च रुचिरतायाः परिचितः कलानां सीमानं परमिह युवामेव भजथः । अपि द्वन्द्वं दिष्ट्या तदिति सुभगे संवदति वाम् अतः शेषं यत्स्याज्जितमिह तदानीं गुणितया ॥२२८॥ अत्र यदित्यत्र तदिति तदानीमित्यत्र यदेति वचनं नास्ति । genitive ending, which is the antecedent of the pronoun ‘yeṣām’), because, according to the dictum of Jaimini (Mīmā. Sū. 3.1.22), when there are several subordinate factors (in the present case, the pronouns ‘yeṣām’, in the first line, ‘yaiḥ’ in the second line and ‘yeṣām’ in the third line), they are all equally subservient to something else, and as such cannot be mutually correlated. The necessary co-ordination (and antecedent) would be got at, if we read ‘kṣapāchāribhiḥ’, (with the instrumental ending, in place of ‘kṣapāchāriṇām’. Another example of the same defect we have in the following— ‘Tvamevaṁ saundaryāḥ sa cha ruchiratāyāḥ parichitaḥ Kalānāṁ sīmānaṁ paramiha yuvāmeva bhajathaḥ Api dvandvaṁ diṣṭyā taditi subhage saṁvadati vām Ataḥ śeṣaṁ yat syāj jitamiha tadānīṁ guṇitayā’. ‘You are endowed with such beauty, and he is not unfamiliar with handsomeness; both of you possess the highest proficiency in the finer arts; thus fortunately the pair of you two is quite compatible; if the subsequent issue were what it should be, then indeed would the en- dowment of qualities become duly glorified.’ Here the relative pronoun ‘yat’ (in the fourth line) requires a corresponding ‘tat’, and the term ‘tadānīm’