काव्यप्रकाश (आचार्य मम्मट - सम्पूर्ण १० उल्लास सटीक)

474 KĀVYAPRAKĀŚA एवं च यथा पुनरुक्तवदाभासः परंपरितरूपकं चोभयोर्भावा- भावानुविधायितया, उभयालंकारौ तथा शब्दहेतुकार्थान्तरन्यास- प्रभृतयोपि द्रष्टव्याः । अर्थस्य तु तत्र वैचित्र्यम् उत्कटतया प्रतिभासते, इति वाच्यालंकारमध्ये वस्तुस्थितिमनपेक्ष्यैव लक्षिताः ॥ योलंकारो यदाश्रितः स तदलंकार इत्यपि कल्पनायाम् अन्वयव्यतिरेकावेव समाश्रयितव्यौ । तदाश्रयणमन्तरेण विशिष्ट- स्याश्रयाश्रयिभावस्याभावादित्यलंकाराणां यथोक्तनिमित्त एव परस्परव्यतिरेको ज्यायान् ॥१४१॥ there can be no other determining basis ; consequently a Figure of Speech is attributed to one or the other accord- ing as it is concomitant, positively as well as negatively, with that. So the Semblance of Repetition and the Conse- quential Metaphor are attributed to both Word and Idea, because their presence or absence is dependent upon the presence and absence of both. Similarly with the ‘Transition’ based upon words and other Figures of speech; even so however the real state of things has been ignored, and these latter have been classed among Ideal figures, simply because what shines forth in them most prominently is the charm of the Idea expressed. Even if we accept the principle that ‘a figure is to be attributed to that on which it rests’, the ultimate criterion to be adopted will have to be the before-mentioned ‘positive and negative concomitance’, especially because in the absence of these latter there can be no idea of the figures subsisting in anything For these reasons it is best to accept the said distinction among Figures of Speech entirely on the basis of the said ‘concomitance’. 141.