काव्यप्रकाश (आचार्य मम्मट - सम्पूर्ण १० उल्लास सटीक)

CHAPTER II 23 विषय्यन्तःकृतेऽन्यस्मिन् सा स्यात्साध्यवसानिका ॥ ११ ॥ विषयिणारोप्यमाणेनान्तःकृते निगीर्णे अन्यस्मिन्नारोपविषये सति साध्यवसाना स्यात् ॥ ११ ॥ भेदाविमौ च सादृश्यात्सम्बन्धान्तरतस्तथा । गौणौ शुद्धौ च विज्ञेयौ इमावारोपाध्यवसानरूपौ सादृश्यहेतू भेदौ ‘गौर्वाहीकः’ इत्यत्र ‘गौरयम्’ इत्यत्र च । अत्र हि स्वार्थसहचारिणो गुणा जाड्यमान्द्यादयो लक्ष्य- माणा अपि गोशब्दस्य परार्थाभिधाने प्रवृत्तिनिमित्तत्वमुपयान्ति That same (Indication) would be called ‘Introsusceptive’ when what is ‘imposed’ swallows the other (that is ‘imposed upon’).—(11) Where the ‘viṣayin’, what is ‘imposed’ ‘swallows’— i. e., takes within itself—‘the other’—i. e., that which is ‘imposed upon’,—it is a case of ‘Introsusceptive’ Indication. 11. These two kinds of Indication (a) when based upon similitude, are known as ‘qualitative’; and (b) as ‘pure’ when they are based upon other kinds of relationship. (A) As examples respectively of the ‘Superimponent’ and ‘Introsusceptive’ Indication, based upon similitude (and hence ‘qualitative’), we have the two expressions (a) ‘gaurvāhīkaḥ’ ) (‘the ploughman is an ox’), and (b) ‘gaurayam’ (‘he is the ox itself’). [In (a) the character of the ‘ox’ is what is ‘imposed’, and the ‘ploughman’ is the one ‘imposed upon’, and both these being mentioned as distinct from one another, it is a case of ‘superimponent’ Indication; while in (b) the character imposed, i. e. the ‘ox’, ‘swallows’ up the man upon whom it is imposed, the man loses his distinct individuality and becomes merged, as it were, in the ‘ox’, hence this becomes a case of the ‘introsusceptive’ Indication.]