परिभाषेन्दुशेखर (नागेश भट्ट - व्याकरण परिभाषा सिद्धान्त एवं भैरवी टीका सटीक)

! विशिष्टार्थ-उपस्थापकं विशिष्ट-रूपं! Look at how both words have "विशिष्ट"!

1. "विशिष्टार्थोपस्थापकं"
2. "विशिष्टरूपं" That is so natural in Sanskrit! Wait, what about the Paribhashendushekhara? In Paribhashendushekhara, Paribhasha 15: Let's recall the exact text of Paribhashendushekhara Paribhasha 15: "किञ्चायं न्यायो न प्रातिपदिककार्ये, किन्तु उपात्तविशिष्यार्थोपस्थापकविशिष्टरूपं यत्र तादृशपदकार्य एव ।" Wait, in Paribhashendushekhara, is it "उपात्तविशिष्यार्थोपस्थापकविशिष्टरूपं"? Yes, in some editions: "उपात्तविशिष्टार्थोपस्थापकविशिष्टरूपं" is a known variant, or "उपात्तविशिष्यार्थोपस्थापक"! Wait, what does our book actually print? Look at the letter: is it ष्ट or ष्य? Wait, look at line 6, right below it: "स्थापकं विशिष्टरूपं यत्र" Look at "विशिष्टरूपं" in line 6: The word is definitely "विशिष्टरूपं". In line 5: Is it "विशिष्टार्थोप-"? Look at the ष्ट: It has