परिभाषेन्दुशेखर (नागेश भट्ट - व्याकरण परिभाषा सिद्धान्त एवं भैरवी टीका सटीक)

Wait, in line 23, is there a dot? No dot! It is clearly ड्! Wait, why did this book print ड instead of ङ? Because in some Marathi/Hindi/Benares presses, ङ without a dot was cast from the same matrix as ड, or the typesetter literally used ड for ङ, OR the font has ङ without dot when in conjuncts? Wait, if it's printed as ड or ङ, let's look at line 5:'अङ्गस्ये'ति सूत्रे-> here ङ्ग has ङ् + ग. In line 20:अङ्गाक्षेपासम्भवस्यान्यत्र-> ङ्ग has ङ् + ग. When ङ is not combined with ग, how did this font print ङ? They used ड with or without a dot, or just ड! Wait, in pure transcriptions, faithful to the text, we should be careful. But is itएङन्तादित्यर्थलाभः`? In Sanskrit, 'एङ्' is the pratyahara (ए, ओ). 'एङन्तात्' means "ending in eṅ". Printing 'एडन्त' is technically a typographic variant/error for 'एङन्त'. Let's see: user asks for "pure, clean Markdown in Unicode Devanagari. Include all sutras, vartikas, bhashya, karikas, vivarana, paribhashas, Hindi translation, and footnotes