परिभाषेन्दुशेखर (नागेश भट्ट - व्याकरण परिभाषा सिद्धान्त एवं भैरवी टीका सटीक)

): Wait, between 'त' and 'वि', is that 'न' or 'न्'? It's a full 'न'. So भाष्यतनविशेषित्य or भाष्यतन्विशेषित्य. Actually, look at 'त' and 'न': it looks like 'तन' or 'तन्'? It's 'तन'. Wait, could it be भाष्यतन्विशेषित्य? Let's check भाष्यतनविशेषित्य vs भाष्यतन्विशेषमाश्रित्य: Wait, let's look at L23: यत्तन्विशेषमाश्रित्येति । 'परौ तरप्तमपौ घः' इति न्यासरूपमिति तदर्थः । Notice in L23 it says: यत्तन्विशेषमाश्रित्येति! Wait, why does L23 say यत्तन्विशेषमाश्रित्येति if L6 says भाष्यतनविशेषित्य? Because the commentator (Bhairava Mishra or Vaidyanatha Payagunde - this is Prabhā or Gadā commentary!) is commenting on Nāgeśa's text which originally was: भाष्ये तन्विशेषमाश्रित्य or तन्विशेषमाश्रित्य! The typesetter made an error in the mūla text! Let's check if the typesetter actually wrote: भाष्यतनविशेषित्य or भाष्यतन्विशेषमाश्रित्य? Wait, let me look AGAIN at that word in L6: