रसार्णव (शैव रस-तन्त्र - प्राचीन भारतीय खनिज रसायन, धातुवाद एवं रस-चिकित्सा सटीक)

' or 'म्रे' or 'प्ते'. Wait, in footnote (6): 'त' then 'प्ते' or 'म्रे'? Wait, let's look at the bottom: it has a curved hook going left/down? No, it's: त - प्ते. But wait, does 'त' have an e-matra? No. Let's look at the next word: 'तैले.' Yes, "तप्ते तैले." - wait, could it be "ताम्रे तैले"? Wait, if main text has "रक्ततैले" (in red oil), variant in K is "तप्ते तैले" (in heated oil). That is a very common variant in Rasashastra texts! Wait, let's look at the letter again: could it be 'ताम्रे'? Look at the first letter: it is 'त', no ā-matra. But wait, look at 'म' in 'मातुलुङ्गाम्ले' (L11): 'म' has a loop on the left. In fn (6), the second letter has a loop on the left: it looks like 'म्रे' or 'प्ते'. Wait, why would K read 'तम्रे तैले'? That's not a word. If it's a typo in the book, or does it say 'ताम्रे तैले'? Look before the 'त': there's no stroke. But