वैयाकरण सिद्धान्त कौमुदी (भट्टोजि दीक्षित - बालमनोरमा व तत्त्वबोधिनी टीका सम्पूर्ण पूर्वार्ध)

: Is it possible the typesetter accidentally used 'द्रि' instead of 'वि'? Let's look at 'द्रि': a 'द' with 'र-फला' and 'ि'? Wait, look at L2: "भ्रियात्" - that's भ + र + ि. Look at L13: "द्विरुक्तस्य" - that's द् + व + ि. In L17: after "नि", there is "ज्" (half ja). Then there is a letter with 'ि' (i-matra). The consonant is 'द्र'? Wait, let's look at the loop: It has a top bar, a short vertical down, a round belly, and a bottom tail curving down-left... that is 'द्र'! Wait, why would it be 'द्रि'? Wait! Could it be "निज्" then "द्रि"? But wait, could the root be "विज्" with some conjunct? Wait! In some Devanagari fonts, 'वि' with a previous consonant or 'द्वि'? Wait, could it be "द्विषाम्"? Wait! Where did "विज्" go? What if the text has: "निज्द्रिविषाम्"? No! Wait, could the three roots be: निज्, विज्, विष्? Wait, look at the letters: नि (ni) ज् (j) then: looks like 'वि' or 'द्रि'? Wait,