वैयाकरण सिद्धान्त कौमुदी (भट्टोजि दीक्षित - बालमनोरमा व तत्त्वबोधिनी टीका सम्पूर्ण पूर्वार्ध)

exactly as visible." Wait, if it looks like ?, I should represent it faithfully. I can use ? (or १? Wait, if someone searches for root 1, they might expect १. But if they want a faithful transcription, ? is what's literally printed. Let's look at ? vs १: wait, does Unicode Devanagari have a question mark? No, ? is ASCII). Wait, let's look at line 1 again: सूत्रात्र्नित्यमित्यनुवर्तते Wait, look at line 1 footnote marker: At the very bottom: १ नित्यमित्यनुवर्तते इति । इदं चिन्त्यम् । Notice that the footnote begins with १. Where does १ appear in the main text? Look at line 1: सूत्रात्र्नित्यमित्यनुवर्तते -> is the character between सूत्रा and नित्य actually त् and १? Wait! Let's zoom in 500% on सूत्रात्र्नित्यमित्यनुवर्तते: सू त् र ा त् १ नि त् य... wait! Look at त्र्नि: There is a त्, with a tiny १ on top of it, and then नित्य