वैयाकरण सिद्धान्त कौमुदी (भट्टोजि दीक्षित - बालमनोरमा व तत्त्वबोधिनी टीका सम्पूर्ण पूर्वार्ध)

? क्?). Wait, why does it look like "नृ... "? Let's look at the letters again: It looks like: " “ " then: "न" then: "ञ्स्न" or "न्ने"? Wait, "न्ने" in old devanagari fonts: A double 'न' is written as one 'न' under another, or side by side. Here there is a vertical stroke, then 'न' and 'न' -> "न्ने"? Wait, look at the matra above: there is an 'e' matra! Then the next letter: has an 'o' matra? No, an 'ī' matra! Wait, look at: "इति ङीपो विधानात्"! Wait, why would it say "इति ङीपो विधानात्"? Because the sutra itself prescribes ङीप्! Wait, what sutra prescribes ङीप् to an-anta (यु -> अन)? "ख्युन्प्रत्ययान्तस्य नान्तत्वाद् ङीप् भवति"! Which sutra gives ङीप् to नान्त? "ऋन्नेभ्यो ङीप्" (४.१.५) gives ङीप् to ऋदन्त and नदन्त (नान्त)! Wait, why does it look like "ऋन्नेभ्यो"? Let's look at the first letter: Could it be "ऋ"? In some old fonts, ऋ is often printed