अणुभाष्य (महाप्रभु वल्लभाचार्य - शुद्धाद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र महाभाष्य प्रकाश टीका सहित)

, Venkateshwar Press), the character 'स्व' often looks very similar to 'ख' if the loop of 'स' and 'व' are combined, OR it is a known ligature for 'स्व': Wait, in some Marathi/Devanagari typesets, 'स्व' is cast as a single type sort where the left part of 'स' is omitted or fused, or it's a typesetter's error where the typesetter picked the 'ख' sort instead of 'स्व' sort (they are in adjacent boxes in the type case!). Let's check: does it say 'स्वसजाती-' or 'खसजाती-'? Visually, the character is 'ख' (or a ligature that looks like 'ख'). But let's look at other 'स्व' in the page: Line 24: 'व्याप्तिस्वरूपम्' - look at 'स्व' in 'स्वरूपम्': It has 'स' and 'व' below it or 'स्व'? In line 24: 'व्याप्तिस्वरूपम्': It has 'स' with 'व' attached to its right leg: 'स्व'! Now look at line 19: It has NO 'स' body! It is literally 'ख'! So the typesetter mistakenly set 'खसजाती-' instead of 'स्वसजाती-'! Wait, should we transcribe what is printed, or what is intended? Usually, faithful transcription of the printed page keeps what is printed, or we transcribe the exact glyph: let'