अणुभाष्य (महाप्रभु वल्लभाचार्य - शुद्धाद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र महाभाष्य प्रकाश टीका सहित)

yeta (passive: the explanation might be conjectured)! Wait, look at the letter: is it 'क्षेत' or 'क्ष्येत'? Look at 'क्ष': below the horizontal curl of ksha, is there a ya-hook? In "विभाव्येत", "व्ये" clearly has a ya loop. In "इत्युत्प्रेक्ष्येत", look between ksha and ta: there is an e-matra, and below the line... wait, it looks like क्षेत or क्ष्येत? It really looks like "इत्युत्प्रेक्ष्येत" or "इत्युत्प्रेक्षेत". Look at 'विभाव्येत' - ya is very clear. In utprekṣeta, it looks like 'क्षेत' without ya, but wait, could it be 'क्ष्येत'? Let's look very closely: there is a slight ligature, but actually "इत्युत्प्रेक्षेत" is also valid if कर्तरि (one might conjecture that...). But wait, in either case, "इत्युत्प्रेक्षेत" is very standard. Wait, look at the print: it is 'इत्युत्प्रेक्षेत'।

Let's check L16 (original L15): 'आहवनीयादध्वर्युःप्रतिप्रस्थातारौ There is no space between 'ध्वर्युः' and 'प्रतिप्रस्थातारौ'.

Everything looks precise and accurate!भाष्यप्रकाश-रश्मि-परिवृंह