अणुभाष्य (महाप्रभु वल्लभाचार्य - शुद्धाद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र महाभाष्य प्रकाश टीका सहित)

"? Wait! Look at line 10, first word: Letter 1: wait, look at line 10 again: Wait! Could it be: "वारणात्"? Wait, why did I think "चारणात्"? Let's check if "वारणात्" makes sense: If it says: "...तस्या अपि नित्यत्वाद् [अ]वारणात्"? Or "नित्यत्वात् [तद्]वारणात्"? Wait, if creation is Brahma-rupa, then creation is eternal. If creation is eternal, then the relation between word and its meaning (the created things) is also eternal! Because the Purvapaksha is: creation is anitya (non-eternal), therefore the relation between Vedic words and worldly objects is anitya (संबन्धानित्यत्व). So by showing that creation is also Brahma-rupa and therefore nitya, the objection of "संबन्धानित्यत्व" is WARNED OFF / REFUTED (वारणात्)! "संबन्धानित्यतेति [शङ्कायाः] वारणात् वेदस्य नित्यत्वमक्षुण्णमेवेत्यर्थः" ! YES! "वारणात्"! "वारणात् संबन्धानित्यतेति"! Wait, but why is there a hyphen after नित्यत्वात्? Wait, look at the end of line 9: Is that "नित्यत्वा-द्" with a hyphen? Or "नित्यत्वात्"? Wait, look at line