गोभिल गृह्यसूत्रम् (सामवेद कौथुम-राणायनीय शाखा - मुकुन्द शर्मा सटीक)

नयोरपि" is slightly different: it has 'त्वा' or 'त्या'? Wait, the idiom is: "दर्शपूर्णमासाभ्यां स्वर्गकामो यजेतेति श्रुत्याऽनयोरपि काम्यत्वम् । 'यावज्जीवं दर्शपूर्णमासाभ्यां यजेते'ति श्रुत्या च नित्यत्वम् ।" Both are "श्रुत्या"! Because both cite a śruti: one śruti gives kāmyatva, the other gives nityatva! Wait, let's look at the print: does it have 'त्त्वा' or 'त्या'? Ah, it's 'त्या'! "श्रुत्याऽनयोरपि". Wait, let's look at the letter: श्रु + त् + य + ा = श्रुत्या. Wait, is that a 'ब'/'व'? Look at the circle: it looks like 'श्रुत्वा'! Many 19th-century prints had typos like 'श्रुत्वा' for 'श्रुत्या'. Let's look very carefully at the image at line 31: श्रु - त् - [?] - ऽ - न - यो - र - पि. It is: श्रु, then त, then below it is a loop like 'वा' or 'या'? It is 'त्वा'! It really is printed as "श्रुत्वाऽनयोरपि" or "श्रुत्याऽनयोरपि"? Wait, look at 'श्रुत्या' at the