गोभिल गृह्यसूत्रम् (सामवेद कौथुम-राणायनीय शाखा - मुकुन्द शर्मा सटीक)

ैककशस्त्रिखिर्वदयेरन् ॥` Wait, look at line 19 again: "५ विष्टरपाद्यार्घ्याचमनीयमधुपर्कानैककशस्त्रिखिर्वदयेरन् ॥" or "स्त्रिस्त्रिर्वदयेरन्"? Wait, look at "स्त्रिखिर्वदयेरन्": is that 'खि' or 'त्रि'? Let's zoom in on that word: 'स' with 'त्र' below, 'ि' -> स्त्रि. Then: looks like 'स्त्रि' where the 'स' is broken? Wait, if you look at 'स्त्रि' right before it: The loop of 'स' is at the top left. In the second glyph, there is a loop at top left, then down, then a bottom curve, then a vertical stroke with 'ि' and repha. Wait, could it be 'स्त्रि' where the bottom leg of 'स' and 'त्र' are smudged into a loop? Or is it really 'खि'? It looks very much like 'खि'! Let's provide the exact character as it appears, which looks like 'खि', or 'स्त्रि'. Wait, in line-by-line transcription, keeping what is visually printed is standard: "स्त्रिखिर्वदयेरन्" (or "स्त्रिस्त्रिर्वदयेरन्"). Let's check if there is an 'स्' before it.