गोभिल गृह्यसूत्रम् (सामवेद कौथुम-राणायनीय शाखा - मुकुन्द शर्मा सटीक)

' in Devanagari is just त्. Wait, त् has a stem? त् is half of त! In old fonts, final त् is often written as a full त with a halanta, or a special final form. Wait, look at line 33 again: "इत्युपसंहारदर्शनात् ।" Wait, why did I think it was 'व'? Look at the character: It's an avagraha? No, it's after 'दर्शना': द - र्श - ना - त् Wait, it has a virama underneath! Yes, it's definitely 'त्'! Wait, why does it look a bit like a 'व' to a quick glance? Because the virama connects to the curve. But grammatically and visually, it's त् with virama: "दर्शनात् ।"

Let's check line 33-34: "स्थूलत्वात्ता-" "भ्यामङ्गुलित्रयस्थलव्यापनात् षडङ्गुलांस्त्यक्तेत्येव युज्यते । अत एव षडङ्गुलान्तरालाः" Wait, "स्थूलत्वात्ताभ्यामङ्गुलित्रयस्थलव्यापनात्": Line 33 ends with: "स्थूलत्वात्ता-" Line 34 starts with: "भ्यामङ्गुलित्रयस्थलव्यापनात्" Yes: ताभ्यां (by them) + अङ्गुलित्रयस्थलव्यापनात्.

Let