काशिका वृत्ति (आचार्य वामन एवं जयादित्य - अष्टाध्यायी सूत्र-वृत्ति सम्पूर्ण सान्वय सटीक)

or ङिन्नास्ति? Actually, in the font: Let's compare 'ङ' and 'ण': 'ङ' has a dot, like in 'चङ्' (L22), 'चङादेशो' (L24), 'आलिङ्गन' (L16). In L28, look at "ङिदुपक्षे": Wait, in "अचीकमत", णिङ् is present, so it is ण्यन्त! Since णिङ् is present, does it have सन्वद्भाव? "सन्वल्लघुनि चङ्परेऽनग्लोपे" (7.4.93) applies to ण्यन्त when followed by चङ्! Wait, if it's ण्यन्त, it gets सन्वद्भाव, hence "अचीकमत" (like चिकीर्षति, with ī from 'सन्वद्भाव' -> 'संन्यास' / 'दीर्घो लघोः' etc.)! And when णिङ् is NOT present, it's just "अचकमत" without सन्वद्भाव! So in the "णिद्-पक्ष" (when णिङ् is taken), there is सन्वद्भाव: "णिदुपक्षे सन्वद्भावः । अचीकमत ।" Wait, but is the letter printed as 'णि' or 'ङि'? In old prints, 'णि' and 'ङि' can look very similar, or it might be printed "णिदुपक्षे