काव्यप्रकाश (आचार्य मम्मट - सम्पूर्ण १० उल्लास सटीक)

CHAPTER II 25 ‘आयुर्घृतम्’ ‘आयुरेवेदम्’ इत्यादौ च सादृश्यादन्यत् कार्यकारणभावादि संबन्धान्तरम् । एवमादौ च कार्यकारण- भावादिलक्षणपूर्वे आरोपाध्यवसाने । अत्र गौणभेदयोर्भेदोपि ताद्रूप्यप्रतीति. सर्वथैवाभेदावगमश्च प्रयोजनम् । शुद्धभेदयोस्त्वन्यवैलक्षण्येनाव्यभिचारेण च कार्य- कारित्वादि । In this passage what is meant by ‘invariable con- comitance’ is only relationship, and not actual (inseparable) concomitance, for if the latter were meant, there could be no indication in the case of such expressions as ‘mañchāḥ krośanti’ (‘the platforms are shouting’). [As there is no inseparable concomitance between the platform and the men on the platform.] In fact it has been rightly observed that in cases where there is actual invariable concomitance (between the indicated and the indicator), one naturally implies the other, and there is no need for the indicative process at all. (b) Examples of the ‘superimponent’ and ‘intro- susuceptive’ Indication, based upon factors other than ‘similitude,’ (and hence ‘pure’) we have in the two ex- pressions ‘Āyurghṛtam’ (‘clarified butter is longevity’) and ‘Āyurevedam’ (‘It is longevity itself’) ; —where the factor upon which the indication is based is some such relationship as that between cause and effect, and the like and in all such cases the two kinds of Indication—‘superim- ponent’ and ‘introsusceptive’—are such as are actually preceded (and brought about) by the said relationships of ‘cause and effect’ and the like.