प्रियदर्शिका नाटिका (सम्राट हर्षवर्धन - चतुरङ्क शास्त्रीय नाटिका सान्वय सटीक)

श्च? Look at रुमण्वाँश्च: रु म ण्व ा ँ श्च. Let's look at the candrabindu: it's above ा. So रुमण्वाँश्च`.

Line 12: राज्यभारमुदूहतुः ॥ Lamb. III. 1. 4. तत्क्षणमपि &c.—It is Wait, Lamb.? In Kathāsaritsāgara, the sections are called "Lambaka"! So Lamb. III. 1. 4.! Perfectly matches!

Line 15: shows that even in ancient times the ministerial office was as not Wait, look at was as not again. Is it was as not? Let's re-examine was as not: w a s then space, then a s? Wait, look at the letters: w a s Then: Wait, is it a t? No, the second letter has a rounded top and bottom: s. Wait, why was as not? Could it be a typo for was not? Yes, 19th-century Indian presses often had typos like this. We transcribe what is printed. It is was as not.

Line 25: a foot-soldier; from पाद् changed to पद् (by पादस्य पदाज्यातिगोपहतेषु