रसार्णव (शैव रस-तन्त्र - प्राचीन भारतीय खनिज रसायन, धातुवाद एवं रस-चिकित्सा सटीक)

ņ or n? In standard Indological transliteration of the era (Bibliotheca Indica), it uses ṇ (with underdot) or n or ṇ? Wait, look at the letter: charanas - wait, footnote (2) has charanas? Let's check: "charaņas" vs "charanas" vs "charaṇas": Look at line 11: charaņas - there is a cedilla or underdot? It looks like charaṇas (underdot on n) or plain charanas? Wait, look at line 17: charana: plain n or ṇ? In line 17: (5) This charaņa is wanting in K. M reads कृत्वा instead of बद्धा. Wait! In कृत्वा: Wait, look at footnote 5: M reads कृत्वा instead of बद्धा. Wait, does it say कृत्वा or हत्वा? Let's look at line 17: M reads कृत्वा instead of बद्धा. Wait, look at कृत्वा: it's कृत्वा or हत्वा? Wait, क with ृ? No, it looks like ह with ल? हत्वा? Wait! In the main text: पिण्डं बद्ध्वा तु विधिवत्⁵.