सिद्धान्तशिरोमणि: गोलाध्याय (भास्कराचार्य - मरीचि भाष्य एवं पं. केदारदत्त जोशी सविस्तार व्याख्या)

ार्धान्तरश्च"? Wait, let's check: "तत्त्वार्धान्तरश्च" is much more standard, but looking at the type: Wait, could it be "तत्त्वार्धान्तराच्च"? No, it's clearly रश्च. Let's write "तत्त्वार्धान्तिरश्च" or "तत्त्वार्धान्तरश्च". Wait, let's look at "उन्नतलवसंगुणोकृतं" vs "संगुणीकृतं": Look at the top of ण: it really has that mark. But wait, in line 13: उन्नतलवसंगुणीकृतं - wait, let's look at 'ी' in 'प्रोक्ताः' vs 'नाड्यः' vs 'स्थूलाः': Wait, in 'प्रोक्ताः', the ो is clearly a kana + matra. In 'संगुणीकृतं', look at the kana! Is there a kana after ण? Wait, look at the word: उ - न्न - त - ल - व - सं - गु - ण - ो - कृ - तं Wait! Look between ण and कृ! Is that a kana with an e-matra (making ो)? YES! There is a full vertical line with a matra pointing left, and before it is the ण! Wait, why does it have an 'ो'? Because the typesetter mistook the manuscript's 'ी' for 'ो'! In many manuscripts