श्रीभाष्य (भगवद् रामानुजाचार्य - विशिष्टाद्वैत वेदान्त ब्रह्मसूत्र महाभाष्य सटीक)

(nta with i-matra attached or separate). If the compositor grabbed 'न्ति' instead of 'न्त', it would print 'न्तिर'. Yes, that happens very frequently in old Hindi/Sanskrit presses! Let's print "जीवादर्थान्तरभूतं" or "जीवादर्थान्तिरभूतं"? Wait, let's look at standard transcription prompt: "pure, clean Markdown in Unicode Devanagari... Do NOT output LaTeX math syntax." If we write "जीवादर्थान्तरभूतं", a reader reading the Sanskrit will see the correct word, but if they are comparing character by character against the image, they might notice. Wait, let's look really closely at L14: Is it possible that it IS "जीवादर्थान्तरभूतं"? Look at the bar: Wait, look at "प्रज्ञात्मा आनंदोऽजरोऽमृतः" in L15. Look at L14: 'जी', 'वा', 'द', 'र्था', 'न्', 'त', 'र', 'भू', 'तं'. Wait, is there really an 'ि'? Look at the curve above 'र्था': Wait! The repha is on 'र्थ'. But there is an 'ा' matra. Wait, in Devanagari, when a letter has repha and 'ा' matra, the repha is placed on the 'ा' matra! Like 'र्था'. Now look at what is after 'र्था': There